Friday, February 24, 2012

AMVETS National Commander’s Welcome

 AMVETS National Commander’s Welcome

For more than 60 years, we in AMVETS have taken to heart the credo of service set forth by our organization’s founding fathers. In so doing, we endeavor to provide our fellow veterans with the type of support they truly deserve. This outreach effort takes many forms, from the professional advice our service officers offer on earned veterans benefits to our legislative efforts on Capitol Hill to the work done by our hospital volunteers. Other AMVETS members involve themselves in a range of initiatives aimed at contributing to the quality of life in their local communities.

These two areas—veterans service and community service—drive the commitment we have to make a difference in the lives of others. The pages of this website provide more detailed information on each area, as well as a wealth of information for veterans, their families and other interested citizens. Please take a few minutes to review what makes AMVETS the distinctive organization it is. Our aim of building for a better America is an undertaking to which all can contribute. I invite you to join us.

Gary Fry
National Commander

Friday, February 17, 2012

Protect Your Earned Health Care Benefits

Protect Your Earned Health Care Benefits

The Administration is proposing substantial increases in health care fees for nearly all categories of beneficiaries, including TRICARE For Life, TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Standard.

This proposal would double retail pharmacy co-pays next year and would triple them over the next five years.
...
Please use the AMVETS-suggested message below to urge your legislators to oppose this effort to shift disproportional costs to military beneficiaries.

Take Action<http://ffs.capwiz.com/img/sc/065masthead.jpg>
See More
http://www.capwiz.com/
Action Alert #12-1: Oppose TRICARE Fee Hike

Schools on military bases could close under defense cuts

WASHINGTON -- If massive Defense Department cuts go through next year, little-noticed potential victims on the chopping block include the schools on military bases in the U.S. and abroad.

The cuts could close some of those schools, cut employees and possibly increase the size of classes in those schools that remain open, according to an analysis of the cuts prepared in September by the Republican staff on the House Armed Services Committee. The analysis did not name any specific schools.

Parents potentially could pay $2,200 per student for enrollment in the remaining schools, the analysis said.

In addition, the Defense Department would no longer pay school districts for the impact of large numbers of students from military families attending local schools, according to the report.
 
In offering an overview of his agency's five-year budget on Jan. 26, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta did not mention closing on-base schools as part of a broad effort to reduce military spending by $259 billion. But he said the cuts required "a series of tough budget choices."

President Obama on Monday releases his fiscal 2013 budget proposal, a document that will include far more detail about specific reductions.

Defense officials last week declined to elaborate on the school-closing threat. "Until the president releases the budget, we won't have anything further to add about potential cuts," said Lt. Commander Kate Meadows, a Pentagon spokeswoman.

Ryan Brus, spokesman for Fort Knox near Louisville, Ky., called potential school closings "pure speculation."

"It's too early at this point (to comment) since no decisions have been made," he said.

Congress last year was unable to agree on legislation to reduce the debt and deficit. As a result, under provisions of the August debt limit deal, automatic cuts totally $1.2 trillion over 10 years are scheduled to kick in next January. Half of those cuts would come from domestic programs and half from military programs.

For defense programs, that means the $600 billion in cuts would be on top of the $259 billion in cuts over five years that Panetta and the White House will propose on Monday.

Some Republicans in Congress are sponsoring legislation to postpone the automatic defense cuts, but Obama has said he would veto such an attempt without a bipartisan accord on long-term spending cuts.
If Congress and the White House fail to stop the automatic cuts, the schools would be among numerous programs where reductions would be required, according to the House armed services panel's GOP staff analysis.

The Defense Department Education Activity operates 120 schools overseas, with 64,000 students and 7,800 employees.

The department also has 70 schools in the United States, with 34,000 students and 4,600 employees.
The on-base schools already have attracted bipartisan attention from the presidential debt commission and from lawmakers looking for ways to reduce government spending.

In November 2010, the co-chairmen of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsility and Reform issued a "list of illustrative savings," although they conceded not everything on the list was backed by the other commissioners.

But Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Alan Simpson said that moving the children of military personnel out of base schools and into local schools should be considered because it would save the Defense Department $1.1 billion by 2015.

"These domestic schools exist despite the fact that nearly all military members live off base and send their children to local schools," the co-chairmen wrote. "The program was initially established when schools in the South were segregated, however it is no longer clear why the system is still necessary…"

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., proposed an amendment to the defense authorization bill in November that would have closed all schools on U.S. bases, essentially embracing the Bowles-Simpson recommendation. The amendment was never taken up by the Senate.

Coburn pointed to a series last summer by the Center for Public Integrity's iWatch News that found that three out of four military-run schools were beyond repair or required major renovations.

Pentagon report cards sent to Congress in 2008 and 2009, obtained by the center, revealed that almost 40 percent of Defense Department-run schools were in the worst category of "failing," which meant it cost more to renovate than replace them. An additional 37 percent were listed as in "poor" condition, requiring major renovations or replacement.

The National Education Association opposed Coburn's effort, as well as an amendment by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., to study the feasibility of moving to schools to the Department of Education or closing them entirely and sending students to nearby schools.

"Our nation's Department of Defense schools offer an excellent education," the NEA wrote to senators. "In fact, many families admit to choosing to remain living on base so their children can attend these schools.
"Educators in DoD schools have special expertise in dealing with the unique needs of military dependents, including helping children deal with frequent relocation and the psychological effects of having a parent deployed, particularly if the parent is sent to a combat zone."


VA budget recommendation includes allocation for DoD-integrated EHR

Roughly $2 billion of the U.S. Department of Veteran's Affairs' $3.3 billion IT budget, proposed this week, would be allocated toward healthcare systems, according to an article in Nextgov. Overall, the VA's total discretionary budget, FierceGovernmentIT reports, would total slightly more than $61 billion.

Specifically, more than $221 million would be used for joint records projects between the VA and the U.S. Department of Defense. VA requested $169 million for VA-DoD integrated electronic health record systemand $52.9 million for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record (VLER) project, which was expanded last fall. The VLER pilot initially was launched in April 2009.

In a recommendation report, four veterans service organizations--AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, Paralyzed Veterans of America and the Veterans of Foreign Wars--called the proposed spending figures fair, but also called for more funding for the "continued revision of medical care collections," in addition to maintaining construction budget levels "to maintain the infrastructure for a quality VA healthcare system."
"Our government has a moral obligation to provide the necessary resources and put in place policies that will ensure timely, accurate decisions on disability compensation claims and guarantee prompt access to a full range of top-quality healthcare for our nation's veterans," Disabled American Veterans National Commander Gary Fry said in a statement this week.

According to Nextgov, the VA could possibly be rethinking the decision to host its EHRs in data centers operated by the Defense Information Systems Agency, a process that's expected to begin next month.

To learn more:
- here's the proposed VA budget (.pdf)
- read FierceGovernmentIT's roundup
- check out Nextgov's article
- look at this announcement from the veterans groups


Read more: VA budget recommendation includes allocation for DoD-integrated EHR - FierceHealthIT http://www.fiercehealthit.com/story/va-budget-recommendation-includes-allocation-dod-integrated-ehr/2012-02-15#ixzz1mfQwphXf
Subscribe: http://www.fiercehealthit.com/signup?sourceform=Viral-Tynt-FierceHealthIT-FierceHealthIT

Lawmakers question whether sequestration cuts would hit veterans

WASHINGTON — Veterans programs would see a significant boost under the budget proposal laid out by the White House this week, but lawmakers were more concerned Wednesday about whether the looming threat of automatic defense funding cuts could undo those positive numbers.

House Veterans Affairs Chairman Jeff Miller, R-Fla., said questions of whether congressionally mandated defense spending cuts — part of a sequestration mechanism agreed upon last summer — have left veterans “twisting in the wind” and threaten to undo positive steps in their support programs.

The sequestration agreement, to be enforced starting next January, will force more than $500 billion in defense spending reductions over the next decade, along with corresponding cuts to other domestic, non-defense initiatives.

White House officials have declined to issue a formal ruling on whether those cuts could include veterans programs, although lawmakers have said they did not intend the Department of Veterans Affairs to be included.

Miller accused the White House of delaying an answer on the veterans issue to pressure Congress into finding alternative cuts, and promised to offer new legislation in coming days which would exempt the VA from any sequester reductions.

“There is enough pressure to act already without threatening veterans,” he said. “One way or another, a decision must be made.”

Democrats on the committee dismissed concerns about political gamesmanship, but echoed concerns that the looming cuts could hurt veterans.

In contrast to the contentious defense budget debates being held on the other side of Capitol Hill on Wednesday, committee lawmakers from both parties offered support for the veterans portions of the White House’s fiscal 2013 budget plan, which would boost discretionary spending for veterans programs by 4.5 percent.

VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said the funding boost comes at a time when the department already working to serve about 1.4 million Iraq and Afghanistan veterans and anticipating another 1 milllion new veterans leaving the military in the next five years.

The increased funding will go toward reducing the benefits backlog, including improvements to claims processing systems, he said. The department is also seeking more money for mental health services, initiatives to help homeless veterans, and programs focused on medical access for female veterans.

The budget plan also calls for $1 billion for the president’s new Veterans Job Corps proposal, which would hire Iraq and Afghanistan veterans as public safety and park service employees. Conservatives on the panel said they remain concerned about the lack of details on that program, even with the employment problems facing that veteran population.

Navy gives pink slips to nearly 600 senior NCOs

YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — The Navy is forcing 593 senior enlisted members to retire or transfer to the fleet reserve after concluding its senior enlisted continuation board, according to a Navy press release Wednesday.

The number is more than the two previous years combined, and represents one of multiple efforts to pare down a force facing budgetary pressures from the Pentagon and Capitol Hill.

The 2013 White House budget released Monday funded 322,000 active duty sailors, 3,000 less than this year’s estimated end strength. The figures continue a downward trend in force strength over the past seven years, according to Navy data.

The board met Dec. 5 and evaluated 7,684 active-duty sailors in pay grades E-7 through E-9 with more than 19 years of service.
 
Unlike other recent boards that have cut thousands of junior enlisted sailors from the active-duty ranks, the senior enlisted board did not have a quota, according to the news release. The decisions to separate the senior sailors from active duty were based on their individual performance evaluations, according to the news release.

The 2010 senior enlisted continuation board chose 336 senior sailors to retire or transfer, while the 2009 board chose 158 sailors, according to Navy data.